BAMV vs QQQ
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $103M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.35% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.11% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.39% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BAMV vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +19.11% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, BAMV is up 17.35% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +18.39% per year against +26.25% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMV has the edge at +18.39% annualized vs +13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.4% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $18 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.28% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BAMV and QQQ share 13 holdings out of 189 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or QQQ?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMV or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMV returned +19.11% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMV annualized +18.39% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.4% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BAMV and QQQ?
BAMV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and QQQ?
BAMV and QQQ share 13 common holdings with a 10.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 189 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or QQQ?
BAMV yields 1.28% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.