BAMV vs QQQ
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BAMV or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BAMV is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 200 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +11.18% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.25% | +24.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.23% | +29.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,368 | $21,392Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.4%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (3 years).
BAMV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMV vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +13.25% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, BAMV is up 11.18% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +16.23% per year against +29.05% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 11.7% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $18 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.19% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
26.4% of BAMV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 12.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings BAMV also owns.
BAMV and QQQ share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 200 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BAMV (85.2% of the fund), and 81 for BAMV that do not appear in QQQ (63.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.62% | 5.88% | 2.74% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.68% | 1.95% | 2.73% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.32% | 0.85% | 1.47% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.22% | 0.79% | 1.43% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 1.73% | 0.68% | 1.05% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.27% | 0.48% | 0.79% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.09% | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 1.12% | 0.31% | 0.81% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.96% | 0.36% | 0.60% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 0.70% | 0.26% | 0.44% |
26.4% of BAMV is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or QQQ?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMV or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMV returned +13.25% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 11.7% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BAMV and QQQ?
BAMV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and QQQ?
26.4% of BAMV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 12.6% of QQQ's is in holdings BAMV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or QQQ?
BAMV yields 1.19% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BAMV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BAMV is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.