BBB vs IVV
Cyber Hornet S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 506 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +6.64% | +12.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.93% | +20.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.17% | +21.71% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.17% | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 175859.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Cyber Hornet ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BBB vs IVV Performance
Cyber Hornet S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) is a ETF from Cyber Hornet ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BBB returned +5.93% while IVV returned +20.63%. Year to date, BBB is up 6.64% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Over three years, BBB compounded at +20.17% per year against +21.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +20.17% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, BBB has the edge at +63.66% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 175859.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for BBB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBB charges 0.96% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBB currently yields 0.16% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BBB and IVV share 478 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 72.4% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBB or IVV?
BBB has an expense ratio of 0.96% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBB or IVV?
Over the past year BBB returned +5.93% vs +20.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BBB annualized +63.66% vs +6.99% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBB or IVV?
BBB has been the more volatile fund at 175859.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BBB -100.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BBB and IVV?
BBB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBB and IVV?
BBB and IVV share 478 common holdings with a 72.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBB or IVV?
BBB yields 0.16% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.