BBB vs IVV
Cyber Hornet S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BBB or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BBB led over 5Y and the full window, IVV over 1Y and 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 509 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.84% | +11.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.57% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.98% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.98%Best | +12.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 173757.4% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $23,843Best | $18,149 |
| Fund Family | Cyber Hornet ETF | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 20, 2011 to Sep 15, 2026 (15.2 years).
BBB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBB vs IVV Performance
Cyber Hornet S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) is an ETF from Cyber Hornet ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BBB returned +1.57% while IVV returned +15.96%. Year to date, BBB is up 4.84% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.
Over three years, BBB compounded at +18.98% per year against +21.01% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +18.98% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, BBB has the edge at +63.18% annualized vs +12.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 173757.4% compared with 14.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBB charges 0.96% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBB currently yields 0.15% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.4% of IVV's money is in holdings BBB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BBB, our book for it covers 59.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of IVV is already inside BBB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
479 positions in common, counted across the 503 positions we hold weights for in BBB and 490 in IVV, against full books of 509 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.81% | 8.07% | 3.26% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.20% | 7.02% | 2.82% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.38% | 5.69% | 2.31% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.28% | 3.84% | 1.56% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.79% | 3.00% | 1.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.57% | 2.65% | 1.08% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.43% | 2.39% | 0.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.13% | 1.90% | 0.77% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.97% | 1.63% | 0.66% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.93% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
98.4% of IVV is already inside BBB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBB or IVV?
BBB has an expense ratio of 0.96% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBB or IVV?
Over the past year BBB returned +1.57% vs +15.96% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BBB annualized +63.18% vs +12.76% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBB or IVV?
BBB has been the more volatile fund at 173757.4% annualized versus 14.3% for IVV.
Should I hold both BBB and IVV?
BBB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBB and IVV?
At least 98.4% of IVV's money is in holdings BBB also owns. Our book for BBB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 479 positions in common, counted across the 503 positions we hold weights for in BBB and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBB or IVV?
BBB yields 0.15% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BBB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BBB led over 5Y and the full window, IVV over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.