BDJ vs IVV

BDJ vs IVV

Which is better, BDJ or IVV?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BDJ is less concentrated, with 25.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVLess Concentrated: BDJ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBDJIVV
Expense Ratio0.84%0.03%Best
AUM$1.9B$886.7B
Dividend Yield8.22%1.10%
Holdings307508
YTD Return+11.04%+13.39%Best
1Y Return+19.70%+20.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+18.30%+21.29%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.43%+12.88%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.5%15.0%Best
Max Drawdown-67.3%-56.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,692$18,327Best
Top 10 Weight25.2%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyBlackRock, Inc. (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 26, 2005May 15, 2000

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2005 to Sep 4, 2026 (21 years).

BDJ vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BDJ vs IVV Performance

Blackrock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust (BDJ) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BDJ returned +19.70% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, BDJ is up 11.04% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Over three years, BDJ compounded at +18.30% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.43% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.64% annualized vs +0.47%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BDJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.3% for BDJ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BDJ charges 0.84% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $84 vs $3 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDJ currently yields 8.22% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BDJ already in IVV74.8%
IVV already in BDJ26.8%

74.8% of BDJ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 26.8% of IVV's money is in holdings BDJ also owns.

Most of BDJ is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, BDJ as of Mar 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

61 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in BDJ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 307 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 436 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BDJ (72.6% of the fund), and 13 for BDJ that do not appear in IVV (11.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BDJWeight in IVVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 372.72%5.44%2.72%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.41%4.01%1.60%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.09%2.56%0.47%
METAMeta Platform Inc 2.03%1.94%0.09%
CCitigroup Inc.2.88%0.35%2.53%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.2.79%0.41%2.38%
ICEInternational Exchange, Inc.2.64%0.13%2.51%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.11%1.45%0.34%
MRKMerck & Company Inc1.84%0.48%1.36%
CVSCvs Health Corp.2.13%0.19%1.94%

74.8% of BDJ is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BDJIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BDJ or IVV?

BDJ has an expense ratio of 0.84% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BDJ or IVV?

Over the past year BDJ returned +19.70% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), BDJ annualized +0.47% vs +9.64% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BDJ or IVV?

BDJ has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BDJ -67.3% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both BDJ and IVV?

BDJ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BDJ and IVV?

74.8% of BDJ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 26.8% of IVV's is in holdings BDJ also owns. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in BDJ and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BDJ or IVV?

BDJ yields 8.22% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BDJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BDJ?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BDJ is less concentrated, with 25.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.