BGDV vs QQQ
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BGDV or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. BGDV is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGDV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $809M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 54 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.81% | +17.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.21% | +24.69%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2%Best | 19.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,613 | $13,670Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.3%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 8, 2026 (1.7 years).
BGDV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
BGDV vs QQQ Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BGDV returned +18.21% while QQQ returned +24.69%. Year to date, BGDV is up 12.81% versus a gain of 17.44% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 11.2% for BGDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BGDV and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGDV charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGDV currently yields 0.99% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
26.5% of BGDV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 30.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings BGDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BGDV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 54 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BGDV (66.5% of the fund), and 34 for BGDV that do not appear in QQQ (66.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGDV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 1.31% | 8.44% | 7.13% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.42% | 5.76% | 3.34% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.60% | 3.16% | 1.44% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 2.80% | 3.36% | 0.56% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 4.12% | 0.79% | 3.33% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.69% | 2.78% | 1.09% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.24% | 2.41% | 1.17% |
| CTASCintas Corp. | 2.52% | 0.35% | 2.17% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.73% | 0.81% | 0.92% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.43% | 1.00% | 0.43% |
30.3% of QQQ is already inside BGDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGDV or QQQ?
BGDV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGDV or QQQ?
Over the past year BGDV returned +18.21% vs +24.69% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGDV annualized +14.63% vs +20.19% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGDV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 11.2% for BGDV. Worst drawdown: BGDV -14.8% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BGDV and QQQ?
BGDV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGDV and QQQ?
30.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings BGDV also owns. 30.3% of QQQ's is in holdings BGDV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BGDV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGDV or QQQ?
BGDV yields 0.99% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BGDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BGDV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. BGDV is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.