BGDV vs VOO
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BGDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGDV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $810M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.30% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.85% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BGDV vs VOO Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) is a ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGDV returned +23.85% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, BGDV is up 16.30% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 11.4% for BGDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BGDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGDV charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGDV currently yields 0.98% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BGDV and VOO share 39 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGDV or VOO?
BGDV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGDV or VOO?
Over the past year BGDV returned +23.85% vs +22.02% for VOO, so BGDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGDV annualized +17.42% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGDV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 11.4% for BGDV. Worst drawdown: BGDV -14.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BGDV and VOO?
BGDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGDV and VOO?
BGDV and VOO share 39 common holdings with a 19.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGDV or VOO?
BGDV yields 0.98% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.