BGDV vs IVV
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGDV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $809M | $886.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.88% | +12.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.52% | +21.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
BGDV vs IVV Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) is a ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BGDV returned +20.52% while IVV returned +21.22%. Year to date, BGDV is up 12.88% versus a gain of 12.92% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.4% for BGDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BGDV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGDV charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGDV currently yields 0.99% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BGDV and IVV share 40 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGDV or IVV?
BGDV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGDV or IVV?
Over the past year BGDV returned +20.52% vs +21.22% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGDV annualized +14.87% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGDV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.4% for BGDV. Worst drawdown: BGDV -14.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BGDV and IVV?
BGDV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGDV and IVV?
BGDV and IVV share 40 common holdings with a 21.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGDV or IVV?
BGDV yields 0.99% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.