BGDV vs VTI
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BGDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGDV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $810M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.73% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.95% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
BGDV vs VTI Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) is a ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGDV returned +23.95% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, BGDV is up 15.73% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.4% for BGDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BGDV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGDV charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGDV currently yields 0.98% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BGDV and VTI share 41 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGDV or VTI?
BGDV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGDV or VTI?
Over the past year BGDV returned +23.95% vs +22.19% for VTI, so BGDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGDV annualized +17.11% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGDV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.4% for BGDV. Worst drawdown: BGDV -14.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BGDV and VTI?
BGDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGDV and VTI?
BGDV and VTI share 41 common holdings with a 18.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGDV or VTI?
BGDV yields 0.98% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.