BROL vs IVV

BROL vs IVV

Which is better, BROL or IVV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.4%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBROLIVV
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM-$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings65508
YTD Return+4.17%+13.23%Best
1Y Return-+17.38%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.67%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.13%
Top 10 Weight44.4%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 25, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BROL vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BROL vs IVV Performance

Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) is an ETF from Baron Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BROL is up 4.17% versus a gain of 13.23% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BROL charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BROL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BROL already in IVV80.1%
IVV already in BROL46.4%

80.1% of BROL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 46.4% of IVV's money is in holdings BROL also owns.

Most of BROL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

47 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in BROL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 65 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 435 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BROL (52.2% of the fund), and 8 for BROL that do not appear in IVV (8.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BROLWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.36%8.07%0.29%
AAPLApple, Inc6.72%7.02%0.30%
GOOGAlphabet Inc6.69%2.39%4.30%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.34%3.84%0.50%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp1.71%5.69%3.98%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.13%2.65%0.48%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.80%1.38%1.42%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.3.33%0.63%2.70%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.04%1.63%0.41%
TSLATesla Inc1.76%1.56%0.20%

80.1% of BROL is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BROLIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BROL or IVV?

BROL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BROL and IVV?

80.1% of BROL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 46.4% of IVV's is in holdings BROL also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in BROL and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BROL or IVV?

BROL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BROL?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.