BSV vs VT

Quick Verdict

BSV has a lower expense ratio. VT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 8927 holdings.

Lower Fees: BSVHigher Returns: VTMore Diversified: VT

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSVVTWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.06%
AUM$44.8B$77.6B
Dividend Yield3.98%1.61%
Holdings3,12510,133
YTD Return+0.41%+14.19%
1Y Return+2.34%+25.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.28%+20.36%
5Y Return (annualized)+1.59%+11.17%
Volatility (annualized)2.4%16.6%
Max Drawdown-9.0%-50.6%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionApr 3, 2007Jun 24, 2008

BSV vs VT Performance

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV returned +2.34% while VT returned +25.25%. Year to date, BSV is up 0.41% versus a gain of 14.19% for VT.

Over three years, BSV compounded at +4.28% per year against +20.36% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +1.59% and +11.17% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VT has the edge at +7.37% annualized vs +0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 2.4% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BSV and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSV charges 0.03% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 3.98% against 1.61% for VT.

Holdings Overlap

0.1%overlap

BSV and VT share 9 holdings out of 11705 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BSVWeight in VTDifference
MMC0.03%0.07%0.04%
DUK0.00%0.09%0.09%
AFL0.01%0.05%0.04%
KVUEProProPro
KDPProProPro
BWAProProPro
GMTProProPro
SFProProPro
LOGG3:BVProProPro
See all 9 holdings BSV shares with VT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSV or VT?

BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VT charges 0.06%. BSV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BSV or VT?

Over the past year BSV returned +2.34% vs +25.25% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), BSV annualized +0.91% vs +7.37% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BSV or VT?

VT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 2.4% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.0% vs VT -50.6%.

Should I hold both BSV and VT?

BSV and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BSV and VT?

BSV and VT share 9 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 11705 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VT?

BSV yields 3.98% while VT yields 1.61%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →