BWTG vs IVV
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWTG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $21M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.46% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.14% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Brendan Wood TopGun | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BWTG vs IVV Performance
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is a ETF from Brendan Wood TopGun and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BWTG returned +15.14% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, BWTG is up 7.46% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.0% for BWTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BWTG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWTG charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWTG currently yields 0.33% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BWTG and IVV share 3 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWTG or IVV?
BWTG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BWTG or IVV?
Over the past year BWTG returned +15.14% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BWTG annualized +20.86% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BWTG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.0% for BWTG. Worst drawdown: BWTG -13.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BWTG and IVV?
BWTG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BWTG and IVV?
BWTG and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 5.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWTG or IVV?
BWTG yields 0.33% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.