BWTG vs IVV
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BWTG or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWTG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 42 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.11% | +14.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.58% | +16.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.31% | +23.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,686 | $18,482Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Brendan Wood TopGun | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2023 to Oct 8, 2026 (2.9 years).
BWTG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
BWTG vs IVV Performance
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is an ETF from Brendan Wood TopGun and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BWTG returned +9.58% while IVV returned +16.27%. Year to date, BWTG is up 6.11% versus a gain of 14.21% for IVV.
Over three years, BWTG compounded at +19.31% per year against +23.01% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BWTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 11.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BWTG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWTG charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWTG currently yields 0.33% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
71.9% of BWTG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 22.7% of IVV's money is in holdings BWTG also owns.
Most of BWTG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
15 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 42 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BWTG (76.5% of the fund), and 1 for BWTG that do not appear in IVV (8.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BWTG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.86% | 8.00% | 1.14% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.95% | 2.40% | 3.55% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.06% | 3.80% | 0.26% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.85% | 2.59% | 1.26% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.66% | 1.66% | 3.00% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 5.95% | 0.25% | 5.70% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.56% | 1.27% | 3.29% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 5.73% | 0.09% | 5.64% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 4.95% | 0.39% | 4.56% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.95% | 1.34% | 2.61% |
71.9% of BWTG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWTG or IVV?
BWTG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWTG or IVV?
Over the past year BWTG returned +9.58% vs +16.27% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWTG or IVV?
BWTG has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 11.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BWTG -13.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BWTG and IVV?
BWTG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BWTG and IVV?
71.9% of BWTG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 22.7% of IVV's is in holdings BWTG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWTG or IVV?
BWTG yields 0.33% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BWTG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.