BWTG vs VOO
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BWTG or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWTG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 26 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +5.67% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.35% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $16,549 | $17,968Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.3% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Brendan Wood TopGun | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.8 years).
BWTG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
BWTG vs VOO Performance
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is an ETF from Brendan Wood TopGun and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BWTG returned +10.35% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, BWTG is up 5.67% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BWTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 11.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BWTG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWTG charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWTG currently yields 0.33% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
71.8% of BWTG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 23.1% of VOO's money is in holdings BWTG also owns.
Most of BWTG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, BWTG as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
15 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 26 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BWTG (76.3% of the fund), and 1 for BWTG that do not appear in VOO (8.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BWTG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.50% | 7.51% | 1.01% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 5.93% | 2.59% | 3.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.02% | 3.62% | 0.40% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.96% | 2.77% | 1.19% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.41% | 2.02% | 2.39% |
| WELLWelltower Inc | 5.83% | 0.25% | 5.58% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp. | 5.76% | 0.09% | 5.67% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.26% | 1.47% | 2.79% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 4.20% | 1.47% | 2.73% |
| PHParker-Hannifin Corp. | 5.28% | 0.19% | 5.09% |
71.8% of BWTG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWTG or VOO?
BWTG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWTG or VOO?
Over the past year BWTG returned +10.35% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWTG or VOO?
BWTG has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 11.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BWTG -13.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BWTG and VOO?
BWTG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BWTG and VOO?
71.8% of BWTG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 23.1% of VOO's is in holdings BWTG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWTG or VOO?
BWTG yields 0.33% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BWTG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.