BWTG vs VTI
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BWTG or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWTG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +7.42% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.49% | +16.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.88% | +22.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,919 | $18,439Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Brendan Wood TopGun | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2023 to Oct 5, 2026 (2.9 years).
BWTG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
BWTG vs VTI Performance
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is an ETF from Brendan Wood TopGun and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BWTG returned +10.49% while VTI returned +16.22%. Year to date, BWTG is up 7.42% versus a gain of 14.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BWTG compounded at +19.88% per year against +22.93% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 11.8% for BWTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BWTG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWTG charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWTG currently yields 0.33% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
71.9% of BWTG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.1% of VTI's money is in holdings BWTG also owns.
Most of BWTG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
15 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 42 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,135 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BWTG (77.3% of the fund), and 1 for BWTG that do not appear in VTI (8.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BWTG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.86% | 6.40% | 0.46% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.95% | 2.31% | 3.64% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.06% | 3.65% | 0.41% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.85% | 2.56% | 1.29% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 5.95% | 0.23% | 5.72% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.66% | 1.29% | 3.37% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 5.73% | 0.08% | 5.65% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.56% | 1.08% | 3.48% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.95% | 1.35% | 2.60% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 4.95% | 0.35% | 4.60% |
71.9% of BWTG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWTG or VTI?
BWTG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWTG or VTI?
Over the past year BWTG returned +10.49% vs +16.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWTG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 11.8% for BWTG. Worst drawdown: BWTG -13.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BWTG and VTI?
BWTG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BWTG and VTI?
71.9% of BWTG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.1% of VTI's is in holdings BWTG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWTG or VTI?
BWTG yields 0.33% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BWTG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.