CARK vs REGS

CARK vs REGS

Which is better, CARK or REGS?

REGS has been ahead.

REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 50.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.1%.

Lower Fees: REGSHigher Returns (1Y): REGSLess Concentrated: REGS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCARKREGS
Expense Ratio0.54%0.35%Best
AUM$306M$77M
Dividend Yield0.01%0.00%
Holdings60168
YTD Return+1.96%+7.06%Best
1Y Return+0.40%-
3Y Return (annualized)+14.38%-
Top 10 Weight63.1%50.5%Best
Fund FamilyCastleArk Management LLCColumbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 6, 2023Mar 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CARK vs REGS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare CARK against instead:CARK vs SPYCARK vs QQQCARK vs VOOCARK vs VTIREGS against:REGS vs VXUS

CARK vs REGS Performance

CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, CARK is up 1.96% versus a gain of 7.06% for REGS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CARK charges 0.54% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $35 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for REGS.

Holdings Overlap

CARK already in REGS65.0%
REGS already in CARK49.5%

65.0% of CARK's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 49.5% of REGS's money is in holdings CARK also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 55 in REGS, against full books of 60 and 168.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 39 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for CARK (47.3% of the fund), and 14 for CARK that do not appear in REGS (33.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CARKWeight in REGSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp13.63%9.99%3.64%
AAPLApple Inc6.58%7.61%1.03%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc9.71%1.57%8.14%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.97%5.15%0.18%
LLYEli Lilly & Co5.72%4.20%1.52%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.28%4.86%0.58%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.56%4.89%1.33%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.84%3.05%0.79%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock4.81%1.91%2.90%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.31%2.36%0.05%

65.0% of CARK is already inside REGS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CARKREGS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CARK or REGS?

CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CARK and REGS?

65.0% of CARK's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 49.5% of REGS's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 55 in REGS.

Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or REGS?

CARK yields 0.01% while REGS yields 0.00%, so CARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is REGS better than CARK?

REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 50.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.