CCOR vs QQQ
Core Alternative ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $28M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.85% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.49% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.70% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.59% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CCOR vs QQQ Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is a ETF from Core Alternative Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CCOR returned +0.49% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, CCOR is up 1.85% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, CCOR compounded at -0.70% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.59% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.29% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $18 annually, a gap of $111 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 0.99% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CCOR and QQQ share 10 holdings out of 130 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or QQQ?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $111 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCOR or QQQ?
Over the past year CCOR returned +0.49% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +1.28% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCOR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CCOR and QQQ?
CCOR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and QQQ?
CCOR and QQQ share 10 common holdings with a 21.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 130 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or QQQ?
CCOR yields 0.99% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.