CCOR vs IVV
Core Alternative ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CCOR or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -1.79% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.37% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.51% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.84% | +13.51%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7%Best | 15.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,113 | $18,844Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.6% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2017 to Sep 18, 2026 (9.3 years).
CCOR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.3 years both funds cover.
CCOR vs IVV Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is an ETF from Core Alternative Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -1.37% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, CCOR is down 1.79% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.51% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.84% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.11% annualized vs +0.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.29% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 0.99% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
98.6% of CCOR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.0% of IVV's money is in holdings CCOR also owns.
Most of CCOR is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 44 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 448 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CCOR (65.6% of the fund), and 2 for CCOR that do not appear in IVV (4.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCOR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.95% | 7.02% | 4.07% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.21% | 5.69% | 1.48% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.11% | 3.00% | 2.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.02% | 3.84% | 0.82% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.81% | 0.97% | 3.84% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.84% | 1.44% | 2.40% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.09% | 1.01% | 3.08% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 4.30% | 0.39% | 3.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.53% | 1.90% | 0.63% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.43% | 0.58% | 2.85% |
98.6% of CCOR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or IVV?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $126 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCOR or IVV?
Over the past year CCOR returned -1.37% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +0.88% vs +14.11% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCOR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both CCOR and IVV?
CCOR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and IVV?
98.6% of CCOR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.0% of IVV's is in holdings CCOR also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or IVV?
CCOR yields 0.99% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CCOR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.