CCOR vs VTI
Core Alternative ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CCOR or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -1.21% | +14.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.16% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.65% | +22.65%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.70% | +12.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7%Best | 16.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,178 | $17,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2017 to Sep 22, 2026 (9.3 years).
CCOR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.3 years both funds cover.
CCOR vs VTI Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is an ETF from Core Alternative Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -0.16% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, CCOR is down 1.21% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.65% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.70% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.76% annualized vs +0.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 0.99% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.8% of CCOR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.1% of VTI's money is in holdings CCOR also owns.
Most of CCOR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
35 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,115 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CCOR (67.4% of the fund), and 1 for CCOR that do not appear in VTI (3.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCOR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.95% | 6.29% | 3.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.21% | 4.79% | 0.58% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.11% | 2.90% | 2.21% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.02% | 3.65% | 0.63% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.81% | 0.86% | 3.95% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.84% | 1.31% | 2.53% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.09% | 0.89% | 3.20% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 4.30% | 0.35% | 3.95% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.53% | 1.70% | 0.83% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.43% | 0.52% | 2.91% |
99.8% of CCOR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or VTI?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $126 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCOR or VTI?
Over the past year CCOR returned -0.16% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +0.94% vs +13.76% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCOR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both CCOR and VTI?
CCOR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and VTI?
99.8% of CCOR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.1% of VTI's is in holdings CCOR also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or VTI?
CCOR yields 0.99% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CCOR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.