CLCG vs QQQ
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CLCG or QQQ?
Nearly the same fund. QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLCG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $29M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 34 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +7.64% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.66% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.3% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,593 | $12,983Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.6% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Crossmark Global Investment | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.2 years).
CLCG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
CLCG vs QQQ Performance
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) is an ETF from Crossmark Global Investment and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CLCG returned +8.66% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, CLCG is up 7.64% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 17.0% for CLCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.3% for CLCG and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLCG charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLCG currently yields 0.06% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
67.4% of CLCG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 48.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings CLCG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in CLCG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 34 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 77 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CLCG (48.8% of the fund), and 13 for CLCG that do not appear in QQQ (29.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CLCG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 17.74% | 8.44% | 9.30% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.72% | 7.27% | 2.45% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.69% | 3.36% | 5.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.49% | 5.76% | 2.27% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.22% | 4.43% | 2.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 3.16% | 0.00% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.70% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.58% | 2.78% | 1.20% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 0.82% | 3.45% | 2.63% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.47% | 2.56% | 1.09% |
67.4% of CLCG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLCG or QQQ?
CLCG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CLCG or QQQ?
Over the past year CLCG returned +8.66% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLCG annualized +13.11% vs +24.30% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CLCG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 17.0% for CLCG. Worst drawdown: CLCG -16.3% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both CLCG and QQQ?
CLCG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CLCG and QQQ?
67.4% of CLCG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 48.7% of QQQ's is in holdings CLCG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in CLCG and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLCG or QQQ?
CLCG yields 0.06% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CLCG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.