CLCG vs VOO
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLCG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.62% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.48% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Crossmark Global Investment | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CLCG vs VOO Performance
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) is a ETF from Crossmark Global Investment and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLCG returned +12.48% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, CLCG is up 8.62% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.3% for CLCG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLCG charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
CLCG and VOO share 28 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLCG or VOO?
CLCG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLCG or VOO?
Over the past year CLCG returned +12.48% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLCG annualized +15.45% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLCG or VOO?
CLCG has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CLCG -16.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CLCG and VOO?
CLCG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CLCG and VOO?
CLCG and VOO share 28 common holdings with a 38.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.