DFUV vs IVV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DFUV delivered stronger 1-year returns. DFUV offers more diversification with 1,342 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFUV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16.0B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 1,342 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +22.68% | +12.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.27% | +20.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.39% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
DFUV vs IVV Performance
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is a ETF from Dimensional and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DFUV returned +32.27% while IVV returned +20.24%. Year to date, DFUV is up 22.68% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, DFUV compounded at +20.39% per year against +21.78% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, DFUV has the edge at +15.27% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFUV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for DFUV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFUV charges 0.21% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $3 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFUV currently yields 1.30% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DFUV and IVV share 272 holdings out of 1562 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFUV or IVV?
DFUV has an expense ratio of 0.21% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DFUV or IVV?
Over the past year DFUV returned +32.27% vs +20.24% for IVV, so DFUV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFUV annualized +15.27% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DFUV or IVV?
DFUV has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DFUV -17.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DFUV and IVV?
DFUV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DFUV and IVV?
DFUV and IVV share 272 common holdings with a 33.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFUV or IVV?
DFUV yields 1.30% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DFUV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.