DFUV vs VYM
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, DFUV or VYM?
Nearly the same fund. VYM costs less.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. DFUV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. DFUV is less concentrated, with 25.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFUV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $15.8B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 1,335 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +21.84%Best | +13.91% |
| 1Y Return | +29.12%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.60%Best | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $18,171Best | $17,082 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.7%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 9, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (4.3 years).
DFUV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
DFUV vs VYM Performance
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is an ETF from Dimensional and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DFUV returned +29.12% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, DFUV is up 21.84% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, DFUV compounded at +19.60% per year against +18.12% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, DFUV has the edge at +14.90% annualized vs +13.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFUV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 13.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for DFUV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFUV charges 0.21% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $4 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFUV currently yields 1.30% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
60.4% of DFUV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 58.6% of VYM's money is in holdings DFUV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
412 positions in common, counted across the 1,329 positions we hold weights for in DFUV and 603 in VYM, against full books of 1,335 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 167 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for DFUV (39.2% of the fund), and 476 for DFUV that do not appear in VYM (37.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFUV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 4.51% | 3.38% | 1.13% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 3.08% | 2.36% | 0.72% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.82% | 2.54% | 0.28% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.54% | 1.93% | 0.39% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 1.86% | 1.28% | 0.58% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 1.39% | 1.56% | 0.17% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 1.33% | 1.56% | 0.23% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 1.06% | 1.15% | 0.09% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.21% | 0.99% | 0.22% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.80% | 1.32% | 0.52% |
60.4% of DFUV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFUV or VYM?
DFUV has an expense ratio of 0.21% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFUV or VYM?
Over the past year DFUV returned +29.12% vs +17.57% for VYM, so DFUV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFUV annualized +14.90% vs +13.26% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFUV or VYM?
DFUV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 13.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: DFUV -17.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both DFUV and VYM?
DFUV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFUV and VYM?
60.4% of DFUV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 58.6% of VYM's is in holdings DFUV also owns. They hold 412 positions in common, counted across the 1,329 positions we hold weights for in DFUV and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFUV or VYM?
DFUV yields 1.30% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than DFUV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. DFUV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. DFUV is less concentrated, with 25.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.