DGT vs IVV
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DGT or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DGT led over 1Y and 5Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. DGT is less concentrated, with 12.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DGT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $628M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 177 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.53% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.44%Best | +16.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | +23.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.17%Best | +14.03% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.3% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,398Best | $19,279 |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.6%Best | 38.1% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2000 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 29, 2000 to Oct 2, 2026 (26 years).
DGT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26 years both funds cover.
DGT vs IVV Performance
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DGT returned +17.44% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, DGT is up 12.53% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Over three years, DGT compounded at +23.17% per year against +23.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.17% and +14.03% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +3.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.3% for DGT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DGT charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGT currently yields 2.43% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
54.1% of DGT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 65.2% of IVV's money is in holdings DGT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
86 positions in common, counted across the 157 positions we hold weights for in DGT and 505 in IVV, against full books of 177 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 412 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DGT (34.2% of the fund), and 6 for DGT that do not appear in IVV (4.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DGT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.67% | 8.00% | 7.33% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.80% | 7.39% | 6.59% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.55% | 5.57% | 5.02% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.61% | 3.80% | 3.19% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.43% | 3.00% | 2.57% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.53% | 2.59% | 2.06% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.27% | 0.77% | 1.50% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.76% | 1.27% | 0.49% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.34% | 2.40% | 2.06% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.47% | 2.15% | 1.68% |
65.2% of IVV is already inside DGT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DGT or IVV?
DGT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DGT or IVV?
Over the past year DGT returned +17.44% vs +16.32% for IVV, so DGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), DGT annualized +3.65% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DGT or IVV?
DGT has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DGT -58.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DGT and IVV?
DGT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DGT and IVV?
65.2% of IVV's money is in holdings DGT also owns. 65.2% of IVV's is in holdings DGT also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 157 positions we hold weights for in DGT and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGT or IVV?
DGT yields 2.43% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DGT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DGT led over 1Y and 5Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. DGT is less concentrated, with 12.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.