EASG vs NTSI
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, EASG or NTSI?
Nearly the same fund. EASG costs less.
EASG has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | NTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14%Best | 0.26% |
| AUM | $68M | $482M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.75% | 3.11% |
| Holdings | 361 | 926 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 16.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.4%Best | -34.0% |
| $10,000 over 5.3 years | $14,549Best | $13,598 |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | May 20, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 56 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EASG has data through Sep 11, 2026 and NTSI through Nov 6, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2021 to Sep 11, 2026 (5.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.7% for EASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.4% for EASG and -34.0% for NTSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while NTSI charges 0.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $26 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.75% against 3.11% for NTSI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 53.1% of EASG's money is in holdings NTSI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSI, our book for it covers 89.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
142 positions in common, counted across the 356 positions we hold weights for in EASG and 441 in NTSI, against full books of 361 and 926.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EASG | Weight in NTSI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 5.68% | 3.04% | 2.64% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 3.05% | 1.69% | 1.36% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 2.43% | 1.43% | 1.00% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 2.10% | 0.98% | 1.12% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 1.67% | 0.83% | 0.84% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk | 1.35% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 1.27% | 0.81% | 0.46% |
| ABBN:SMAbb Ltd | 1.32% | 0.75% | 0.57% |
| IBE:MAIberdrola S.A. | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.62% |
| 8411:TKMizuho Financial Group Inc | 1.09% | 0.65% | 0.44% |
53.1% of EASG is already inside NTSI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or NTSI?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while NTSI charges 0.26%. EASG is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EASG or NTSI?
NTSI has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.7% for EASG. Worst drawdown: EASG -31.4% vs NTSI -34.0%.
Should I hold both EASG and NTSI?
EASG and NTSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EASG and NTSI?
At least 53.1% of EASG's money is in holdings NTSI also owns. Our book for NTSI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 142 positions in common, counted across the 356 positions we hold weights for in EASG and 441 in NTSI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or NTSI?
EASG yields 3.75% while NTSI yields 3.11%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSI better than EASG?
EASG has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.