EDV vs VTV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV has a lower expense ratio. VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTV offers more diversification with 308 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.5B | $186.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.83% | 2.29% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | -5.62% | +18.10% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.94% | +29.51% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.55% | +18.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.40% | +12.32% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Jan 26, 2004 |
EDV vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -4.94% while VTV returned +29.51%. Year to date, EDV is down 5.62% versus a gain of 18.10% for VTV.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.55% per year against +18.49% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are -12.40% and +12.32% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTV has the edge at +7.60% annualized vs -1.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 4.83% against 2.29% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VTV share 0 holdings out of 384 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VTV?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTV charges 0.03%. VTV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VTV?
Over the past year EDV returned -4.94% vs +29.51% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.48% vs +7.60% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VTV?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both EDV and VTV?
EDV and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VTV?
EDV and VTV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 384 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VTV?
EDV yields 4.83% while VTV yields 2.29%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.