ENFR vs TNGY
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Tortoise Energy Fund ETF
Which is better, ENFR or TNGY?
Each has led over a different period.
ENFR has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, TNGY over the full window. ENFR is less concentrated, with 60.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | TNGY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $508M | $520M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.83% | 3.95% |
| Holdings | 60 | 57 |
| YTD Return | +22.84% | +27.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | +26.27%Best | +24.80% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.06% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 18.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8%Best | -13.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $12,534 | $12,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.1%Best | 69.2% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Tortoise Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | Jun 16, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026 (1.4 years).
ENFR vs TNGY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
ENFR vs TNGY Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Tortoise Energy Fund ETF (TNGY) is an ETF from Tortoise Capital. Over the past year ENFR returned +26.27% while TNGY returned +24.80%. Year to date, ENFR is up 22.84% versus a gain of 27.17% for TNGY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 18.6% for TNGY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for ENFR and -13.7% for TNGY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while TNGY charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $85 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 3.83% against 3.95% for TNGY.
Holdings Overlap
47.3% of ENFR's money is in holdings TNGY also owns. 33.5% of TNGY's money is in holdings ENFR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 27 in TNGY, against full books of 60 and 57.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for TNGY that do not appear in our book for ENFR (66.2% of the fund), and 12 for ENFR that do not appear in TNGY (24.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENFR | Weight in TNGY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 5.16% | 7.85% | 2.69% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 5.21% | 7.36% | 2.15% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 6.23% | 4.98% | 1.25% |
| ETEnergy Transfer Lp | 8.39% | 0.90% | 7.49% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 4.97% | 3.70% | 1.27% |
| PAGPPlains Gp Holdings Lp | 5.03% | 3.22% | 1.81% |
| MPLXMplx Lp | 4.99% | 1.02% | 3.97% |
| VGVenture Global Inc | 2.39% | 3.55% | 1.16% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 4.93% | 0.93% | 4.00% |
47.3% of ENFR is already inside TNGY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or TNGY?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while TNGY charges 0.85%. ENFR is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ENFR or TNGY?
Over the past year ENFR returned +26.27% vs +24.80% for TNGY, so ENFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ENFR annualized +17.51% vs +19.58% for TNGY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ENFR or TNGY?
ENFR has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 18.6% for TNGY. Worst drawdown: ENFR -9.8% vs TNGY -13.7%.
Should I hold both ENFR and TNGY?
ENFR and TNGY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and TNGY?
47.3% of ENFR's money is in holdings TNGY also owns. 33.5% of TNGY's is in holdings ENFR also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 27 in TNGY.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or TNGY?
ENFR yields 3.83% while TNGY yields 3.95%, so TNGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TNGY better than ENFR?
ENFR has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, TNGY over the full window. ENFR is less concentrated, with 60.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.