EOS vs VTI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EOS or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $850M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.64% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 96 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -2.03% | +13.10%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.48% | +17.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.07% | +22.26%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.68% | +11.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.6% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,181 | $17,608Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2005 to Sep 24, 2026 (21.7 years).
EOS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.7 years both funds cover.
EOS vs VTI Performance
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EOS returned -3.48% while VTI returned +17.01%. Year to date, EOS is down 2.03% versus a gain of 13.10% for VTI.
Over three years, EOS compounded at +16.07% per year against +22.26% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.68% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.50% annualized vs +2.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.6% for EOS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOS charges 1.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOS currently yields 7.64% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.6% of EOS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 41.6% of VTI's money is in holdings EOS also owns.
Most of EOS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
53 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EOS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 96 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,098 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EOS (55.9% of the fund), and 2 for EOS that do not appear in VTI (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EOS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 12.69% | 6.40% | 6.29% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.29% | 0.73% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.43% | 4.79% | 1.64% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 8.24% | 2.31% | 5.93% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.23% | 3.65% | 2.58% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 7.00% | 2.56% | 4.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 1.70% | 1.78% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.70% | 1.35% | 2.35% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 3.59% | 0.51% | 3.08% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.23% | 0.83% | 1.40% |
97.6% of EOS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOS or VTI?
EOS has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $106 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EOS or VTI?
Over the past year EOS returned -3.48% vs +17.01% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), EOS annualized +2.35% vs +9.50% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EOS or VTI?
EOS has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EOS -63.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EOS and VTI?
EOS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EOS and VTI?
97.6% of EOS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 41.6% of VTI's is in holdings EOS also owns. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EOS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOS or VTI?
EOS yields 7.64% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EOS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.