EQTY vs JLCO

EQTY vs JLCO

Which is better, EQTY or JLCO?

JLCO costs less.

JLCO has a lower expense ratio. EQTY is less concentrated, with 42.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: JLCOLess Concentrated: EQTY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEQTYJLCO
Expense Ratio0.99%0.39%Best
AUM$1.4B$10M
Dividend Yield0.02%0.00%
Holdings77111
YTD Return+8.96%Best-2.26%
1Y Return+15.10%-
3Y Return (annualized)+17.64%-
Top 10 Weight42.9%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyKovitz Investment GroupJohn Hancock Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 28, 2011Jul 14, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

EQTY vs JLCO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare EQTY against instead:EQTY vs SPYEQTY vs QQQEQTY vs VOOEQTY vs VTIJLCO against:JLCO vs VXUS

EQTY vs JLCO Performance

Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) is an ETF from Kovitz Investment Group and John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, EQTY is up 8.96% versus a loss of 2.26% for JLCO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EQTY charges 0.99% per year while JLCO charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $39 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQTY currently yields 0.02% against 0.00% for JLCO.

Holdings Overlap

EQTY already in JLCO20.1%
JLCO already in EQTY31.4%

20.1% of EQTY's money is in holdings JLCO also owns. 31.4% of JLCO's money is in holdings EQTY also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EQTY and 54 in JLCO, against full books of 77 and 111.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 38 positions for JLCO that do not appear in our book for EQTY (61.6% of the fund), and 27 for EQTY that do not appear in JLCO (73.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EQTYWeight in JLCODifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.24%8.22%2.98%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.14%6.17%3.03%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc0.84%6.87%6.03%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.61%3.35%1.74%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.57%2.82%1.25%
NFLXNetflix Inc2.59%0.98%1.61%
ANETArista Networks, Inc1.79%1.57%0.22%
AMATApplied Material1.68%1.39%0.29%
LOWLowes Cos., Inc.1.69%0.05%1.64%

31.4% of JLCO is already inside EQTY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EQTYJLCO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EQTY or JLCO?

EQTY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while JLCO charges 0.39%. JLCO is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between EQTY and JLCO?

31.4% of JLCO's money is in holdings EQTY also owns. 31.4% of JLCO's is in holdings EQTY also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EQTY and 54 in JLCO.

Which pays a higher dividend, EQTY or JLCO?

EQTY yields 0.02% while JLCO yields 0.00%, so EQTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JLCO better than EQTY?

JLCO has a lower expense ratio. EQTY is less concentrated, with 42.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.