ESGG vs IVV
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ESGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. ESGG offers more diversification with 729 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESGG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $116M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.29% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 729 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.80% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.88% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.41% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
ESGG vs IVV Performance
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ESGG returned +25.88% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ESGG is up 17.80% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, ESGG compounded at +21.83% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.41% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ESGG has the edge at +14.07% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for ESGG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESGG charges 0.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESGG currently yields 1.29% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ESGG and IVV share 104 holdings out of 1077 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESGG or IVV?
ESGG has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ESGG or IVV?
Over the past year ESGG returned +25.88% vs +21.79% for IVV, so ESGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ESGG annualized +14.07% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ESGG or IVV?
ESGG has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ESGG -32.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ESGG and IVV?
ESGG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ESGG and IVV?
ESGG and IVV share 104 common holdings with a 39.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1077 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESGG or IVV?
ESGG yields 1.29% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ESGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.