FB vs SCHD
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FB or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FB | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 501 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +25.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.20% | +27.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8%Best | -4.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,400 | $13,371Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.2 years).
FB vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
FB vs SCHD Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF (FB) is an ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FB returned +10.20% while SCHD returned +27.61%. Year to date, FB is up 7.44% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 3.4% for FB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for FB and -4.6% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FB charges 0.58% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $6 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FB currently yields 1.97% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
At least 91.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings FB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for FB, our book for it covers 77.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of SCHD is already inside FB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
44 positions in common, counted across the 483 positions we hold weights for in FB and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 501 and 103.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FB | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.38% | 4.77% | 4.39% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.27% | 4.70% | 4.43% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.22% | 4.69% | 4.47% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.39% | 4.17% | 3.78% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.41% | 4.02% | 3.61% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.43% | 3.88% | 3.45% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 0.46% | 3.82% | 3.36% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.41% | 3.83% | 3.42% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.22% | 3.97% | 3.75% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 0.17% | 3.94% | 3.77% |
91.0% of SCHD is already inside FB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FB or SCHD?
FB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FB or SCHD?
Over the past year FB returned +10.20% vs +27.61% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FB annualized +11.54% vs +27.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FB or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 3.4% for FB. Worst drawdown: FB -1.8% vs SCHD -4.6%.
Should I hold both FB and SCHD?
FB and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FB and SCHD?
At least 91.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings FB also owns. Our book for FB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 44 positions in common, counted across the 483 positions we hold weights for in FB and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FB or SCHD?
FB yields 1.97% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FB?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.