FB vs QQQ
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. FB offers more diversification with 501 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 501 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +6.65% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.37% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FB vs QQQ Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF (FB) is a ETF from ProShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FB returned +11.37% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, FB is up 6.65% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.5% for FB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for FB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FB charges 0.58% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $18 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FB currently yields 1.99% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FB and QQQ share 87 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.3% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FB or QQQ?
FB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FB or QQQ?
Over the past year FB returned +11.37% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FB annualized +11.44% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.5% for FB. Worst drawdown: FB -1.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FB and QQQ?
FB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FB and QQQ?
FB and QQQ share 87 common holdings with a 54.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FB or QQQ?
FB yields 1.99% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.