FB vs VYM
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FB or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FB | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 501 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.20% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4%Best | 8.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8%Best | -6.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,400 | $12,608Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.2 years).
FB vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
FB vs VYM Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF (FB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FB returned +10.20% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, FB is up 7.44% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.7% compared with 3.4% for FB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for FB and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FB charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FB currently yields 1.97% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 85.8% of VYM's money is in holdings FB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for FB, our book for it covers 77.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VYM is already inside FB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
232 positions in common, counted across the 483 positions we hold weights for in FB and 603 in VYM, against full books of 501 and 613.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FB | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.32% | 7.29% | 4.97% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.14% | 3.38% | 2.24% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.73% | 2.54% | 1.81% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.75% | 2.36% | 1.61% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.57% | 1.93% | 1.36% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.48% | 2.01% | 1.53% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.52% | 1.85% | 1.33% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 0.48% | 1.56% | 1.08% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 0.46% | 1.56% | 1.10% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.43% | 1.46% | 1.03% |
85.8% of VYM is already inside FB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FB or VYM?
FB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FB or VYM?
Over the past year FB returned +10.20% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FB annualized +11.54% vs +21.30% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FB or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 8.7% annualized versus 3.4% for FB. Worst drawdown: FB -1.8% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both FB and VYM?
FB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FB and VYM?
At least 85.8% of VYM's money is in holdings FB also owns. Our book for FB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 232 positions in common, counted across the 483 positions we hold weights for in FB and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FB or VYM?
FB yields 1.97% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FB?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.