FBCV vs VTI
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FBCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $166M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 114 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.06% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.90% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.60% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.20% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
FBCV vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBCV returned +30.90% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, FBCV is up 19.06% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, FBCV compounded at +15.60% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.20% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FBCV has the edge at +14.30% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.5% for FBCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for FBCV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCV charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCV currently yields 1.32% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FBCV and VTI share 94 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCV or VTI?
FBCV has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBCV or VTI?
Over the past year FBCV returned +30.90% vs +24.16% for VTI, so FBCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FBCV annualized +14.30% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBCV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.5% for FBCV. Worst drawdown: FBCV -15.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FBCV and VTI?
FBCV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCV and VTI?
FBCV and VTI share 94 common holdings with a 20.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCV or VTI?
FBCV yields 1.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FBCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.