FBL vs TARK

FBL vs TARK

Which is better, FBL or TARK?

FBL has been ahead.

FBL has a lower expense ratio. FBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: FBLHigher Returns: FBL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFBLTARK
Expense Ratio1.09%Best1.48%
AUM$193M$17M
Dividend Yield3.30%28.11%
Holdings410
YTD Return+10.47%Best+3.10%
1Y Return-13.09%Best-21.87%
3Y Return (annualized)+37.27%Best+35.81%
Volatility (annualized)67.9%Best85.2%
Max Drawdown-63.2%Best-65.5%
$10,000 over 3.8 years$97,926Best$23,994
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesTradr ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionDec 13, 2022Apr 28, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2022 to Oct 13, 2026 (3.8 years).

FBL vs TARK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.

Compare FBL against instead:FBL vs SPYFBL vs QQQFBL vs VOOFBL vs VTITARK against:TARK vs VXUS

FBL vs TARK Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year FBL returned -13.09% while TARK returned -21.87%. Year to date, FBL is up 10.47% versus a gain of 3.10% for TARK.

Over three years, FBL compounded at +37.27% per year against +35.81% for TARK. Across the full 4-year window we track, FBL has the edge at +82.29% annualized vs +25.90%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 85.2% compared with 67.9% for FBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for FBL and -65.5% for TARK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FBL charges 1.09% per year while TARK charges 1.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $148 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBL currently yields 3.30% against 28.11% for TARK.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FBL and TARK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FBLTARK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FBL or TARK?

FBL has an expense ratio of 1.09% while TARK charges 1.48%. FBL is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FBL or TARK?

Over the past year FBL returned -13.09% vs -21.87% for TARK, so FBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FBL annualized +82.29% vs +25.90% for TARK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FBL or TARK?

TARK has been the more volatile fund at 85.2% annualized versus 67.9% for FBL. Worst drawdown: FBL -63.2% vs TARK -65.5%.

Should I hold both FBL and TARK?

FBL and TARK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FBL or TARK?

FBL yields 3.30% while TARK yields 28.11%, so TARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TARK better than FBL?

FBL has a lower expense ratio. FBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.