FBOT vs IVV
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FBOT or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FBOT led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBOT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $210M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 53 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.90%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +16.95%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.53% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $15,218 | $18,488Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.3 years).
FBOT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
FBOT vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FBOT returned +16.95% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, FBOT is up 12.90% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FBOT compounded at +19.53% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for FBOT and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBOT charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBOT currently yields 0.42% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
44.3% of FBOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 24.1% of IVV's money is in holdings FBOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FBOT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 53 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FBOT (74.6% of the fund), and 6 for FBOT that do not appear in IVV (6.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBOT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.83% | 8.07% | 3.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.13% | 5.69% | 4.56% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.12% | 3.84% | 1.72% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 5.52% | 0.08% | 5.44% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 5.18% | 0.25% | 4.93% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.79% | 2.39% | 0.40% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.75% | 0.65% | 3.10% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 4.31% | 0.07% | 4.24% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 1.56% | 0.01% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 2.52% | 0.13% | 2.39% |
44.3% of FBOT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBOT or IVV?
FBOT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBOT or IVV?
Over the past year FBOT returned +16.95% vs +16.61% for IVV, so FBOT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBOT or IVV?
FBOT has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FBOT -23.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FBOT and IVV?
FBOT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBOT and IVV?
44.3% of FBOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 24.1% of IVV's is in holdings FBOT also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FBOT and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBOT or IVV?
FBOT yields 0.42% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FBOT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FBOT led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.