FBOT vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FBOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: FBOTMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFBOTIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%
AUM$217M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.42%1.09%
Holdings53508
YTD Return+19.60%+13.80%
1Y Return+27.38%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.70%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)19.4%15.1%
Max Drawdown-23.6%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 13, 2023May 15, 2000

FBOT vs IVV Performance

Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FBOT returned +27.38% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, FBOT is up 19.60% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, FBOT compounded at +19.70% per year against +21.49% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FBOT has the edge at +16.20% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for FBOT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FBOT charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBOT currently yields 0.42% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

14.4%overlap

FBOT and IVV share 19 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FBOTWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA4.60%7.76%3.16%
TER5.87%0.09%5.78%
AMZN2.20%3.75%1.55%
GOOGProProPro
MSFTProProPro
DEProProPro
PLTRProProPro
TSLAProProPro
AXONProProPro
EMRProProPro
See all 10 holdings FBOT shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FBOT or IVV?

FBOT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FBOT or IVV?

Over the past year FBOT returned +27.38% vs +23.70% for IVV, so FBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FBOT annualized +16.20% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FBOT or IVV?

FBOT has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FBOT -23.6% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FBOT and IVV?

FBOT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FBOT and IVV?

FBOT and IVV share 19 common holdings with a 14.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FBOT or IVV?

FBOT yields 0.42% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →