FBOT vs VTI
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FBOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBOT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $217M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.60% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.38% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.70% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
FBOT vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBOT returned +27.38% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, FBOT is up 19.60% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, FBOT compounded at +19.70% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, FBOT has the edge at +16.20% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for FBOT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBOT charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBOT currently yields 0.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FBOT and VTI share 22 holdings out of 2811 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBOT or VTI?
FBOT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBOT or VTI?
Over the past year FBOT returned +27.38% vs +24.16% for VTI, so FBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FBOT annualized +16.20% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBOT or VTI?
FBOT has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FBOT -23.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FBOT and VTI?
FBOT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FBOT and VTI?
FBOT and VTI share 22 common holdings with a 14.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2811 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBOT or VTI?
FBOT yields 0.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.