FBOT vs VTI
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FBOT or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FBOT led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBOT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $210M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +16.81%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +26.06%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.33% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $15,614 | $18,263Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2023 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.2 years).
FBOT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
FBOT vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBOT returned +26.06% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, FBOT is up 16.81% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, FBOT compounded at +19.33% per year against +20.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for FBOT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBOT charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBOT currently yields 0.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 49.5% of FBOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FBOT and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBOT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.80% | 6.32% | 1.52% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 6.08% | 0.10% | 5.98% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.23% | 3.17% | 0.94% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.98% | 2.27% | 0.71% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 4.88% | 0.22% | 4.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.12% | 3.81% | 2.69% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 3.98% | 0.06% | 3.92% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.15% | 0.35% | 2.80% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 1.35% | 1.63% | 0.28% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 2.60% | 0.11% | 2.49% |
49.5% of FBOT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBOT or VTI?
FBOT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBOT or VTI?
Over the past year FBOT returned +26.06% vs +20.00% for VTI, so FBOT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBOT or VTI?
FBOT has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FBOT -23.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FBOT and VTI?
FBOT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBOT and VTI?
At least 49.5% of FBOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FBOT and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBOT or VTI?
FBOT yields 0.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FBOT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FBOT led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.