FBOT vs VOO
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FBOT or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FBOT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBOT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $210M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 53 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.90%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +16.95%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.53% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $15,218 | $18,488Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.3 years).
FBOT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
FBOT vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBOT returned +16.95% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, FBOT is up 12.90% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, FBOT compounded at +19.53% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 12.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for FBOT and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBOT charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBOT currently yields 0.42% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
46.0% of FBOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 23.4% of VOO's money is in holdings FBOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FBOT and 494 in VOO, against full books of 53 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 468 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FBOT (75.7% of the fund), and 5 for FBOT that do not appear in VOO (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBOT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.83% | 7.55% | 2.72% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.13% | 5.36% | 4.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.12% | 4.13% | 2.01% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 5.52% | 0.09% | 5.43% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 5.18% | 0.23% | 4.95% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.79% | 2.62% | 0.17% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 4.31% | 0.07% | 4.24% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.75% | 0.44% | 3.31% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 1.36% | 0.19% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 2.52% | 0.13% | 2.39% |
46.0% of FBOT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBOT or VOO?
FBOT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBOT or VOO?
Over the past year FBOT returned +16.95% vs +16.61% for VOO, so FBOT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBOT or VOO?
FBOT has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 12.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FBOT -23.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FBOT and VOO?
FBOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBOT and VOO?
46.0% of FBOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 23.4% of VOO's is in holdings FBOT also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FBOT and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBOT or VOO?
FBOT yields 0.42% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FBOT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FBOT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.