FBOT vs VOO
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FBOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBOT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $210M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.87% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.68% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.71% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FBOT vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBOT returned +24.68% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, FBOT is up 17.87% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, FBOT compounded at +19.71% per year against +21.27% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, FBOT has the edge at +15.36% annualized vs +13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for FBOT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBOT charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBOT currently yields 0.44% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FBOT and VOO share 19 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBOT or VOO?
FBOT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBOT or VOO?
Over the past year FBOT returned +24.68% vs +19.96% for VOO, so FBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FBOT annualized +15.36% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBOT or VOO?
FBOT has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FBOT -23.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FBOT and VOO?
FBOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FBOT and VOO?
FBOT and VOO share 19 common holdings with a 14.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBOT or VOO?
FBOT yields 0.44% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.