FCUS vs IVV
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FCUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCUS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $90M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +21.28% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +50.87% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.68% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pinnacle Dynamic Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
FCUS vs IVV Performance
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) is a ETF from Pinnacle Dynamic Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FCUS returned +50.87% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, FCUS is up 21.28% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, FCUS compounded at +27.68% per year against +22.19% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, FCUS has the edge at +25.55% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for FCUS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCUS charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCUS currently yields 3.77% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FCUS and IVV share 11 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCUS or IVV?
FCUS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FCUS or IVV?
Over the past year FCUS returned +50.87% vs +21.79% for IVV, so FCUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FCUS annualized +25.55% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FCUS or IVV?
FCUS has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FCUS -39.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FCUS and IVV?
FCUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FCUS and IVV?
FCUS and IVV share 11 common holdings with a 4.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCUS or IVV?
FCUS yields 3.77% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FCUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.