FCUS vs QQQ
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FCUS or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FCUS led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. FCUS is less concentrated, with 45.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCUS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 32 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +41.70%Best | +25.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.54% | +24.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 17.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $21,621 | $27,707Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.6%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Pinnacle Dynamic Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.7 years).
FCUS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
FCUS vs QQQ Performance
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) is an ETF from Pinnacle Dynamic Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FCUS returned +41.70% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, FCUS is up 14.50% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Over three years, FCUS compounded at +24.54% per year against +24.63% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +31.71% annualized vs +23.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 17.5% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for FCUS and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCUS charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCUS currently yields 3.77% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
33.4% of FCUS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings FCUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FCUS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 32 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 31 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 86 positions FCUS does not, 83.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, GOOGL 3.36%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FCUS | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.60% | 4.43% | 0.83% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 5.31% | 0.88% | 4.43% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.35% | 3.45% | 1.10% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.34% | 2.23% | 1.11% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 4.61% | 0.83% | 3.78% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 3.57% | 0.81% | 2.76% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 2.98% | 0.79% | 2.19% |
| ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common | 2.88% | 0.24% | 2.64% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 2.62% | 0.41% | 2.21% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.14% | 0.53% | 1.61% |
33.4% of FCUS is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCUS or QQQ?
FCUS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FCUS or QQQ?
Over the past year FCUS returned +41.70% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so FCUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FCUS annualized +23.17% vs +31.71% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FCUS or QQQ?
FCUS has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 17.5% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FCUS -39.9% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both FCUS and QQQ?
FCUS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FCUS and QQQ?
33.4% of FCUS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.6% of QQQ's is in holdings FCUS also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FCUS and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCUS or QQQ?
FCUS yields 3.77% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FCUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FCUS?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FCUS led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. FCUS is less concentrated, with 45.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.