FCUS vs QQQ
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FCUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCUS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $90M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.28% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +50.87% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.68% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pinnacle Dynamic Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FCUS vs QQQ Performance
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) is a ETF from Pinnacle Dynamic Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FCUS returned +50.87% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, FCUS is up 21.28% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, FCUS compounded at +27.68% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, FCUS has the edge at +25.55% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 29.6% for FCUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for FCUS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCUS charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCUS currently yields 3.77% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FCUS and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 128 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCUS or QQQ?
FCUS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FCUS or QQQ?
Over the past year FCUS returned +50.87% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so FCUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FCUS annualized +25.55% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FCUS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 29.6% for FCUS. Worst drawdown: FCUS -39.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FCUS and QQQ?
FCUS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FCUS and QQQ?
FCUS and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 128 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCUS or QQQ?
FCUS yields 3.77% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FCUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.