FDIV vs QQQ
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FDIV or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $57M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.34% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 113 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -2.04% | +21.16%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.27% | +24.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.15% | +27.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $11,464 | $20,595Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.7%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Sep 24, 2026 (3 years).
FDIV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
FDIV vs QQQ Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FDIV returned +0.27% while QQQ returned +24.78%. Year to date, FDIV is down 2.04% versus a gain of 21.16% for QQQ.
Over three years, FDIV compounded at +5.15% per year against +27.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 12.6% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for FDIV and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.34% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
26.0% of FDIV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings FDIV also owns.
FDIV and QQQ share little of their money.
21 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 113 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 75 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FDIV (73.4% of the fund), and 84 for FDIV that do not appear in QQQ (70.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.18% | 8.44% | 4.26% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.02% | 3.16% | 0.14% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.14% | 2.78% | 0.36% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.56% | 1.86% | 0.70% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp 3.125 06/15/2060 | 2.55% | 1.69% | 0.86% |
| KLACKla Corp | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.76% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 1.16% | 0.81% | 0.35% |
| TMUST-Mobile Us Inc Com Usd0.00001 | 0.91% | 0.82% | 0.09% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.39% | 0.51% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.69% | 0.36% | 0.33% |
26.0% of FDIV is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or QQQ?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIV or QQQ?
Over the past year FDIV returned +0.27% vs +24.78% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 12.6% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: FDIV -18.6% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both FDIV and QQQ?
FDIV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and QQQ?
26.0% of FDIV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.1% of QQQ's is in holdings FDIV also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or QQQ?
FDIV yields 2.34% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FDIV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.