FDIV vs VOO
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $59M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 113 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.74% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.64% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.99% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FDIV vs VOO Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is a ETF from MarketDesk Indices and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDIV returned +8.64% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FDIV is up 6.74% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FDIV compounded at +7.99% per year against +22.19% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 12.0% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for FDIV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.38% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FDIV and VOO share 103 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or VOO?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDIV or VOO?
Over the past year FDIV returned +8.64% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDIV annualized +7.99% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDIV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 12.0% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: FDIV -18.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FDIV and VOO?
FDIV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and VOO?
FDIV and VOO share 103 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or VOO?
FDIV yields 2.38% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.