FDIV vs IVV
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FDIV or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 31.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $70M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 113 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +5.32% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.66% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.34% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $12,368 | $18,365Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.9%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Sep 4, 2026 (3 years).
FDIV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
FDIV vs IVV Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDIV returned +6.66% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FDIV is up 5.32% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FDIV compounded at +7.34% per year against +21.29% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for FDIV and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIV charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIV currently yields 2.38% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
97.7% of FDIV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 30.0% of IVV's money is in holdings FDIV also owns.
Most of FDIV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
105 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 504 in IVV, against full books of 113 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 388 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FDIV (69.3% of the fund), and 1 for FDIV that do not appear in IVV (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDIV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.01% | 7.98% | 3.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.05% | 2.98% | 0.07% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.82% | 1.94% | 0.88% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.11% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
| V'visa Inc., Class 'a'' | 3.24% | 0.92% | 2.32% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.12% | 0.94% | 2.18% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.32% | 0.69% | 2.63% |
| KOCoca-cola Co. | 3.06% | 0.51% | 2.55% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 3.04% | 0.53% | 2.51% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.93% | 0.64% | 2.29% |
97.7% of FDIV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIV or IVV?
FDIV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDIV or IVV?
Over the past year FDIV returned +6.66% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDIV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: FDIV -18.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FDIV and IVV?
FDIV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIV and IVV?
97.7% of FDIV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 30.0% of IVV's is in holdings FDIV also owns. They hold 105 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in FDIV and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIV or IVV?
FDIV yields 2.38% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FDIV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 31.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.