FFLG vs QQQ
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $590M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +9.91% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.70% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.82% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.46% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FFLG vs QQQ Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFLG returned +19.70% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, FFLG is up 9.91% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, FFLG compounded at +25.82% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.46% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.3% for FFLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for FFLG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLG charges 0.38% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $18 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLG currently yields 0.14% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FFLG and QQQ share 32 holdings out of 171 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLG or QQQ?
FFLG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLG or QQQ?
Over the past year FFLG returned +19.70% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFLG annualized +9.46% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.3% for FFLG. Worst drawdown: FFLG -44.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FFLG and QQQ?
FFLG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLG and QQQ?
FFLG and QQQ share 32 common holdings with a 46.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 171 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLG or QQQ?
FFLG yields 0.14% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.