FFLG vs VOO
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FFLG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FFLG led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $590M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 104 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.21% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.02% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.83%Best | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.88% | +13.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,017 | $18,827Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.4% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 4, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.6 years).
FFLG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.
FFLG vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFLG returned +14.02% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, FFLG is up 11.21% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, FFLG compounded at +25.83% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.88% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.47% annualized vs +9.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for FFLG and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLG charges 0.38% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLG currently yields 0.13% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
85.3% of FFLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.2% of VOO's money is in holdings FFLG also owns.
Most of FFLG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
61 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in FFLG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 104 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 426 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FFLG (45.9% of the fund), and 27 for FFLG that do not appear in VOO (8.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFLG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 17.67% | 7.55% | 10.12% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.50% | 3.24% | 8.26% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.87% | 7.05% | 0.18% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.82% | 5.36% | 1.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.94% | 4.13% | 1.19% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.12% | 2.86% | 0.26% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.42% | 1.44% | 1.98% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.26% | 1.41% | 1.85% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 1.90% | 0.82% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.94% | 2.62% | 1.68% |
85.3% of FFLG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLG or VOO?
FFLG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFLG or VOO?
Over the past year FFLG returned +14.02% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFLG annualized +9.56% vs +14.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFLG or VOO?
FFLG has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FFLG -44.6% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both FFLG and VOO?
FFLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLG and VOO?
85.3% of FFLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.2% of VOO's is in holdings FFLG also owns. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in FFLG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLG or VOO?
FFLG yields 0.13% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FFLG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FFLG led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.