FFLG vs VOO
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $590M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.61% | +12.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.59% | +20.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.43% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.19% | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FFLG vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFLG returned +17.59% while VOO returned +20.59%. Year to date, FFLG is up 9.61% versus a gain of 12.73% for VOO.
Over three years, FFLG compounded at +25.43% per year against +21.70% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.19% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for FFLG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLG charges 0.38% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLG currently yields 0.14% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FFLG and VOO share 61 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLG or VOO?
FFLG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLG or VOO?
Over the past year FFLG returned +17.59% vs +20.59% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFLG annualized +9.39% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLG or VOO?
FFLG has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FFLG -44.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FFLG and VOO?
FFLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLG and VOO?
FFLG and VOO share 61 common holdings with a 46.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLG or VOO?
FFLG yields 0.14% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.