FIFT vs ZAP
HCM Select 50 ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, FIFT or ZAP?
ZAP costs less.
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIFT | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $67M | $428M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 50 | 94 |
| YTD Price Return | - | +7.60% |
| 1Y Price Return | - | +6.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.8% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -13.5% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 43.0% |
| Fund Family | Howard Capital Management | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2026 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Price Return (annualized), 5Y Price Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FIFT. We have no price series for FIFT, so there is nothing to compare it against. FIFT yields 0.00% and ZAP 1.87% on top.
FIFT vs ZAP Performance
HCM Select 50 ETF (FIFT) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIFT charges 1.35% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $50 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIFT currently yields 0.00% against 1.87% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
8.1% of FIFT's money is in holdings ZAP also owns. 13.1% of ZAP's money is in holdings FIFT also owns.
ZAP and FIFT share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 50 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 45 positions we hold weights for.
ZAP holds 39 positions FIFT does not, 81.4% of the fund.
Largest: BE 4.90%, PWR 4.59%, AME 4.53%, D 4.34%, ED 4.30%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FIFT and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIFT or ZAP?
FIFT has an expense ratio of 1.35% while ZAP charges 0.50%. ZAP is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FIFT and ZAP?
13.1% of ZAP's money is in holdings FIFT also owns. 13.1% of ZAP's is in holdings FIFT also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIFT or ZAP?
FIFT yields 0.00% while ZAP yields 1.87%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than FIFT?
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.