FLCG vs VTI
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $568M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.86% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.48% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
FLCG vs VTI Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLCG returned +13.48% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, FLCG is up 8.86% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for FLCG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCG charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCG currently yields 0.05% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLCG and VTI share 91 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCG or VTI?
FLCG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLCG or VTI?
Over the past year FLCG returned +13.48% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLCG annualized +19.22% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLCG or VTI?
FLCG has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLCG -22.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLCG and VTI?
FLCG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCG and VTI?
FLCG and VTI share 91 common holdings with a 38.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCG or VTI?
FLCG yields 0.05% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.