FSTA vs IVV
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FSTA or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSTA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 98 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.54% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.25% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.02% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.54% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.7%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,727 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.7% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2013 to Sep 4, 2026 (12.9 years).
FSTA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
FSTA vs IVV Performance
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FSTA returned +6.25% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FSTA is up 9.54% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FSTA compounded at +9.02% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.54% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.86% annualized vs +7.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.4% for FSTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.7% for FSTA and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSTA charges 0.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSTA currently yields 2.17% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
83.6% of FSTA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.5% of IVV's money is in holdings FSTA also owns.
Most of FSTA is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in FSTA and 505 in IVV, against full books of 98 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FSTA (94.9% of the fund), and 57 for FSTA that do not appear in IVV (14.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSTA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 13.58% | 0.74% | 12.84% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 11.36% | 0.63% | 10.73% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 8.61% | 0.51% | 8.10% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 8.41% | 0.51% | 7.90% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 4.47% | 0.44% | 4.03% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 4.20% | 0.29% | 3.91% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.68% | 0.17% | 3.51% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 2.67% | 0.12% | 2.55% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co. | 2.38% | 0.11% | 2.27% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 2.31% | 0.10% | 2.21% |
83.6% of FSTA is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSTA or IVV?
FSTA has an expense ratio of 0.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FSTA or IVV?
Over the past year FSTA returned +6.25% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FSTA annualized +7.02% vs +12.86% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FSTA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.4% for FSTA. Worst drawdown: FSTA -25.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FSTA and IVV?
FSTA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FSTA and IVV?
83.6% of FSTA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.5% of IVV's is in holdings FSTA also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in FSTA and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSTA or IVV?
FSTA yields 2.17% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FSTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FSTA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.