FTCS vs JHDV
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs John Hancock US High Dividend ETF
Which is better, FTCS or JHDV?
JHDV has been ahead.
JHDV has a lower expense ratio. JHDV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 21.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | JHDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.34%Best |
| AUM | $8.1B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 2.21% |
| Holdings | 52 | 229 |
| YTD Return | +14.44% | +15.58%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.13% | +17.64%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.75% | +19.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 13.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -19.0% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $16,178 | $19,821Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.2%Best | 33.7% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Sep 27, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2022 to Nov 13, 2026 (4.1 years).
FTCS vs JHDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
FTCS vs JHDV Performance
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and John Hancock US High Dividend ETF (JHDV) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year FTCS returned +15.13% while JHDV returned +17.64%. Year to date, FTCS is up 14.44% versus a gain of 15.58% for JHDV.
Over three years, FTCS compounded at +12.75% per year against +19.67% for JHDV. Across the full 4-year window we track, JHDV has the edge at +18.16% annualized vs +12.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JHDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 12.8% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for FTCS and -19.0% for JHDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.53% per year while JHDV charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $34 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.12% against 2.21% for JHDV.
Holdings Overlap
16.1% of FTCS's money is in holdings JHDV also owns. 12.6% of JHDV's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.
FTCS and JHDV share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 74 in JHDV, against full books of 52 and 229.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for JHDV that do not appear in our book for FTCS (84.3% of the fund), and 41 for FTCS that do not appear in JHDV (81.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in JHDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.59% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Group Inc | 2.01% | 1.90% | 0.11% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.07% | 1.63% | 0.44% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 2.05% | 1.14% | 0.91% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.99% | 1.10% | 0.89% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.08% | 0.41% | 1.67% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.97% | 0.50% | 1.47% |
| TGTTarget Corp. | 1.93% | 0.39% | 1.54% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTCS and JHDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or JHDV?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.53% while JHDV charges 0.34%. JHDV is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCS or JHDV?
Over the past year FTCS returned +15.13% vs +17.64% for JHDV, so JHDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTCS annualized +12.45% vs +18.16% for JHDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTCS or JHDV?
JHDV has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 12.8% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: FTCS -12.6% vs JHDV -19.0%.
Should I hold both FTCS and JHDV?
FTCS and JHDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and JHDV?
16.1% of FTCS's money is in holdings JHDV also owns. 12.6% of JHDV's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 74 in JHDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or JHDV?
FTCS yields 1.12% while JHDV yields 2.21%, so JHDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JHDV better than FTCS?
JHDV has a lower expense ratio. JHDV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 21.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.