FVAL vs VYM
Fidelity Value Factor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FVAL or VYM?
FVAL has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FVAL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FVAL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 130 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +13.69%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +20.68%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.20%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.11%Best | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.7% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,514Best | $17,861 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2016 to Sep 18, 2026 (10 years).
FVAL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
FVAL vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FVAL returned +20.68% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, FVAL is up 13.69% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, FVAL compounded at +20.20% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.11% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FVAL has the edge at +13.52% annualized vs +10.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 14.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.7% for FVAL and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FVAL charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FVAL currently yields 1.56% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
36.4% of FVAL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 41.0% of VYM's money is in holdings FVAL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
73 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in FVAL and 557 in VYM, against full books of 130 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 456 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FVAL (56.4% of the fund), and 56 for FVAL that do not appear in VYM (61.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FVAL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 7.35% | 4.37% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.26% | 2.51% | 1.25% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.03% | 2.63% | 1.60% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.03% | 1.80% | 0.77% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.77% | 1.50% | 0.73% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.95% | 1.31% | 0.36% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.69% | 1.48% | 0.79% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.76% | 1.37% | 0.61% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.89% | 1.07% | 0.18% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.56% | 1.34% | 0.78% |
41.0% of VYM is already inside FVAL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FVAL or VYM?
FVAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FVAL or VYM?
Over the past year FVAL returned +20.68% vs +15.34% for VYM, so FVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FVAL annualized +13.52% vs +10.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FVAL or VYM?
FVAL has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 14.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FVAL -37.7% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both FVAL and VYM?
FVAL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FVAL and VYM?
41.0% of VYM's money is in holdings FVAL also owns. 41.0% of VYM's is in holdings FVAL also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in FVAL and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FVAL or VYM?
FVAL yields 1.56% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FVAL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FVAL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.