FWD vs IVV
AB Disruptors ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FWD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FWD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.3B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 125 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +21.13% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +42.76% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.07% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 22, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FWD vs IVV Performance
AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FWD returned +42.76% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, FWD is up 21.13% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, FWD compounded at +34.07% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FWD has the edge at +33.12% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FWD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for FWD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FWD charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FWD currently yields 0.09% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FWD and IVV share 51 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FWD or IVV?
FWD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FWD or IVV?
Over the past year FWD returned +42.76% vs +20.94% for IVV, so FWD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FWD annualized +33.12% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FWD or IVV?
FWD has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FWD -29.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FWD and IVV?
FWD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FWD and IVV?
FWD and IVV share 51 common holdings with a 23.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FWD or IVV?
FWD yields 0.09% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.