GEQ vs VYM

GEQ vs VYM

Which is better, GEQ or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. GEQ is less concentrated, with 17.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: GEQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGEQVYM
Expense Ratio0.27%0.04%Best
AUM$209M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings644613
YTD Return+1.38%+11.71%Best
1Y Return-+16.24%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Top 10 Weight17.5%Best26.1%
Fund FamilyCambria Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionJun 9, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GEQ vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GEQ vs VYM Performance

Cambria Global EW 2 ETF (GEQ) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GEQ is up 1.38% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GEQ charges 0.27% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $4 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEQ currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

GEQ already in VYM19.3%
VYM already in GEQ81.2%

19.3% of GEQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 81.2% of VYM's money is in holdings GEQ also owns.

Most of VYM is already inside GEQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

157 positions in common, counted across the 644 positions we hold weights for in GEQ and 557 in VYM, against full books of 644 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 372 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GEQ (16.1% of the fund), and 282 for GEQ that do not appear in VYM (58.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GEQWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.88%7.35%6.47%
JPMJpmorgan Chase0.88%3.82%2.94%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.0.54%2.63%2.09%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common0.36%2.51%2.15%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.0.59%1.80%1.21%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares0.38%1.86%1.48%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials0.23%1.66%1.43%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.0.35%1.50%1.15%
CVXChevron Corp0.32%1.48%1.16%
HDHome Depot Inc/The0.46%1.34%0.88%

81.2% of VYM is already inside GEQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GEQVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GEQ or VYM?

GEQ has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GEQ and VYM?

81.2% of VYM's money is in holdings GEQ also owns. 81.2% of VYM's is in holdings GEQ also owns. They hold 157 positions in common, counted across the 644 positions we hold weights for in GEQ and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, GEQ or VYM?

GEQ yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than GEQ?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. GEQ is less concentrated, with 17.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.