GEQ vs VOO

GEQ vs VOO

Which is better, GEQ or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. GEQ is less concentrated, with 17.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: GEQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGEQVOO
Expense Ratio0.27%0.03%Best
AUM$209M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings644509
YTD Return+1.38%+11.01%Best
1Y Return-+15.60%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.82%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.60%
Top 10 Weight17.5%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyCambria Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 9, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GEQ vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GEQ vs VOO Performance

Cambria Global EW 2 ETF (GEQ) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GEQ is up 1.38% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GEQ charges 0.27% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

GEQ already in VOO46.9%
VOO already in GEQ90.4%

46.9% of GEQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 90.4% of VOO's money is in holdings GEQ also owns.

Most of VOO is already inside GEQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

286 positions in common, counted across the 644 positions we hold weights for in GEQ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 644 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 202 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GEQ (8.8% of the fund), and 162 for GEQ that do not appear in VOO (31.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GEQWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc1.95%7.05%5.10%
NVDANvidia Corp1.44%7.55%6.11%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp1.88%5.36%3.48%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.15%4.13%2.98%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A0.79%3.24%2.45%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.88%2.86%1.98%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.10%2.62%1.52%
JPMJpmorgan Chase0.88%1.46%0.58%
METAMeta Platforms Inc0.32%1.90%1.58%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.0.60%1.41%0.81%

90.4% of VOO is already inside GEQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GEQVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GEQ or VOO?

GEQ has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GEQ and VOO?

90.4% of VOO's money is in holdings GEQ also owns. 90.4% of VOO's is in holdings GEQ also owns. They hold 286 positions in common, counted across the 644 positions we hold weights for in GEQ and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, GEQ or VOO?

GEQ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GEQ?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. GEQ is less concentrated, with 17.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.